Separation and divorce: CGT consequences .... and relief

Brad Dickfos • September 19, 2024

With apparently at least one in three marriages ending in divorce – and with countless more defacto relationships breaking down – the capital gains tax (CGT) roll-over provisions for “marriage and relationship breakdowns” has assumed increasing relevance.


These rules provide for the “roll-over” of any capital gain on the transfer of assets between the separating parties so that there is not any immediate CGT liability in the circumstances.


However, they (like all CGT concessions) are subject to important conditions to be met and special rules that apply to certain categories of assets.


The first and foremost of these conditions is that the transfer of the asset must take place in accordance with one of the specific ways set out in the provisions – and these are essentially by way of a relevant court order or a defined financial or maintenance agreement.


And here’s the first big planning opportunity: if one of the parties wants to realise a capital loss on an asset that they propose to transfer to the other spouse, then don’t transfer it under any of the ways specified in the CGT rollover provisions – do it by way of a private agreement with the other party.


The second key rule is that the roll-over does not apply unless the asset is transferred to the other spouse. It cannot be transferred to the other spouse’s discretionary trust or private company. It cannot even be transferred to the estate of the other spouse if that spouse dies during the separation proceedings.


The only possible exception to this rule is if the asset is transferred to a “child maintenance trust” – and even then strict conditions would apply.


In addition, not all assets can get roll-over under these rules. For example, trading stock is excluded and would be subject to the normal rules that apply to the disposal of trading stock outside the ordinary course of business.


Of course, if the rollover applies it does not mean CGT is avoided; it just means that it is deferred until the spouse to whom the asset is transferred later sells the asset or it is subject to a CGT event in their hands.


However, in this case they would generally acquire the other party’s “cost base” for the purposes of calculating any capital gain or loss. And they would also generally be entitled to the CGT 50% discount if it was held for the required time.


Nevertheless, there is an important and tricky rule that applies where the asset that is transferred is a dwelling (eg, a rental property) which is used for another purpose in the hands of the other spouse (eg, their home).


In this case, the spouse who acquires the asset will be liable for CGT for the gain that accrued while it was a rental property – even though it became their home from the time they acquired it from the other spouse until they later sold it.


Suffice to say, this type of scenario requires some careful negotiations between the parties before such a transaction is undertaken to make sure everything is “fair” for all the parties.


There are also special rules that apply when, say, an asset that is held by a family company or trust is transferred out of that company or trust to the other party as part of a settlement agreement.


Again, these rules can be complex and require good advice to ensure that all the issues are managed effectively.


So, all in all, if you are facing any spousal separation issues come and speak to us first about the ins-and-outs of the rules that apply on any transfer of assets.

And perhaps some of the impact of divorce or separation can be alleviated by making sure that the CGT rollover is used most effectively – because like death, divorce affords certain tax planning opportunities.

By Brad Dickfos December 9, 2025
Sometimes it can be, but only in limited circumstances. The tax deductibility of expenditure on clothing is subject to strict ATO guidelines. These cover occupation-specific clothing, compulsory or registered non-compulsory uniforms and protective items. Conventional clothing What you can’t claim is the cost of conventional clothing, even where your employer expects you to observe a particular dress style. You might work in an office environment, and your employer expects you to wear a business suit to work, even though you wouldn’t have even bought the suit but for your employer’s dress requirements. While the cost of the suit might seem like a work related expense, it is not deductible as it is conventional clothing that could also be worn outside of work. This makes it a private expense, even though it relates directly to your employment. Conventional clothing includes business attire, non-monogrammed black trousers and white shirts worn by wait staff, non-protective jeans and drill shirts worn by tradies and athletic clothes and shoes worn by PE teachers. Occupation-specific clothing On the other hand, occupation-specific clothing falls on the deductible side of the line, for example a chef’s distinctive chequered pants or a health worker’s blue uniform, including nurses’ stockings and non-slip shoes. Compulsory uniforms The cost of clothing that forms part of a compulsory uniform is generally deductible. A compulsory uniform is a set of clothing that identifies you as an employee of a particular organisation. Your employer must make it compulsory to wear the uniform and have a strictly enforced workplace policy in place. You can only claim a deduction for shoes, socks and stockings if: They are an essential part of a distinctive compulsory uniform, and The characteristics (the colour, style and type) are an integral and distinctive part of your uniform that your employer specifies in the uniform policy, for example, airline cabin crew members. You can claim for a single item of clothing such as a jumper if it's distinctive and compulsory for you to wear it at work. An item of clothing is unique and distinctive if it: Has been designed and made only for the employer, and Has the employer's logo permanently attached and is not available to the public. Just wearing a jumper of a particular colour is not part of a compulsory uniform, even if your employer requires you to wear it, or you pin a badge to it. Non-compulsory uniforms You can only claim for non-compulsory work uniforms if your employer has registered the design with AusIndustry. This means the uniform has to be on the Register of Approved Occupational Clothing. Your employer will be able to clarify whether your uniform is registered. Protective clothing The cost of protective clothing is deductible, and covers such items as: Fire-resistant clothing Sun protection clothing with a UPF sun protection rating Hi-viz vests Non-slip nurse’s shoes Protective boots, such as steel-capped boots or rubber boots for concreters Gloves and heavy-duty shirts and trousers Occupational heavy duty wet-weather gear Boiler suits, overalls, smocks or aprons you wear to avoid damaging or soiling your ordinary clothes during your work activities. Laundry and dry-cleaning costs and repairs You are entitled to a deduction for the cost of cleaning your deductible clothing. If you launder them at home, the Tax Office will allow you a deduction of $1 per load where the load contains only deductible clothing, or 50 cents per load where deductible clothing is mixed with other items. You are entitled to claim the cost of dry-cleaning deductible clothing, as well as the cost of mending and repairs. Record keeping You should keep receipts or other documentary evidence of your expenditure on buying, laundering or repairing deductible work clothing. Proof of laundering clothing at home can be in the form of diary entries. Allowances If your employer pays you a clothing allowance, this needs to be included in your assessable income, and you can only claim what you have actually spent. Feel free to come and see us for advice as to whether your expenditure on work clothing is deductible.
By Brad Dickfos December 1, 2025
Big news for anyone with a large super balance – the government has gone back to the drawing board on the controversial Division 296 tax , and the changes are a big step toward fairness and common sense. A quick recap When the Division 296 tax was first announced in 2023, it caused an uproar. The main problem? It would have taxed unrealised gains, that is, paper profits you haven’t actually made yet and set a $3 million threshold that wasn’t indexed meaning it wouldn’t rise with inflation. After a wave of feedback from the industry, the government has listened. The Treasurer’s new announcement, made in October 2025, fixes some of the biggest issues. The revamped version is designed to be fairer, simpler, and more in line with how tax usually works. The plan is to start the new system from 1 July 2026, with the first tax bills expected in 2027–28. What’s changing Here’s what’s new under the revised Division 296 tax: · Only real earnings will be taxed. No more tax on unrealised gains as you’ll only pay on earnings you’ve actually made. · Super funds will work out members’ real earnings and report this to the ATO. · The $3 million threshold will be indexed to inflation in $150,000 increments, keeping pace with rising costs. · A new $10 million threshold will be introduced. Earnings above that will be taxed at a higher rate of 40%, and that threshold will also rise with inflation. · The start date is pushed back to 1 July 2026, giving everyone more time to prepare. · Defined benefit pensions are included, so all types of super funds are treated the same. So what does this mean in practice? Think of it as a tiered tax system: · Up to $3 million – normal super tax of 15%. · Between $3 million and $10 million – taxed at 30%. · Over $10 million – taxed at 40%. Basically, the more you have in super, the higher the tax rate on your earnings above those thresholds. How it will work Super funds will continue reporting members’ balances to the ATO, which will figure out who’s over the $3 million mark. If you are, your fund will tell the ATO your actual earnings (not paper gains). The ATO will then calculate how much extra tax you owe. We don’t yet have the fine print on what exactly counts as “realised earnings,” but it’s likely to mean profits you’ve actually made, similar to how taxable income is treated now. What’s still up in the air While these updates make the system much fairer, there are still a few unanswered questions: · What exactly counts as “earnings”? Will it only include profits made after 1 July 2026, or could older gains that are sold later be included too? · What happens with capital gains? Super funds usually get a one-third discount on capital gains for assets held over a year, but it’s unclear whether that will still apply. · How will pension-phase income be handled? Some super income is tax-free when you’re in the pension phase, and we don’t yet know how that will interact with the new rules. · Can people with over $10 million move money out? If your earnings above $10 million are taxed at 40%, you might want to shift funds elsewhere but the government hasn’t said if that’ll be allowed. What it means for you If your super balance is over $10 million, the proposed rules mean that a portion of your superannuation earnings could attract a higher tax rate of up to 40%. For people with between $3 million and $10 million, the new system could also change how much tax applies to their super earnings, depending on how the final legislation defines “realised gains.”  But don’t rush. These rules aren’t law yet, and if you take your super out, it’s hard to put it back because of contribution limits. It’s best to wait for the final legislation and get professional advice before making any decision to withdraw benefits from super.
By Brad Dickfos November 18, 2025
( ) Knowing the rules around Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT), GST credits and what is or isn’t tax deductible can help keep tax costs to a minimum. Holiday celebrations generally take the form of Christmas parties and/or gift giving. (<->)